[CentOS-mirror] what should be in centos 5.1 directory?

Prof. P. Sriram sriram at ae.iitm.ac.in
Thu Aug 7 11:12:41 UTC 2008


On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> 5.1 should now be empty with just a readme file explaining the 
> situation. Its possible one of the servers behind us-msync isnt updated 
> as yet, I can check that.

please do check. my last sync log shows centosn and it has a fully 
populated 5.1 tree.

-- 
sriram



More information about the CentOS-mirror mailing list