[CentOS-mirror] Missing headers in 5.0, odd link structure

Brandon Davidson brandond at uoregon.edu
Tue Jul 1 10:28:21 UTC 2008

Brandon Davidson wrote:
> I guess I never paid all that much attention to it before just now, but 
> has the CentOS 5 tree always been missing the HEADER.html and 
> HEADER.images links? It's not pretty any more :(
> Also, why are the directories inside /5 individually linked to their 
> current version, instead of directly linking /5 to /5.2 as was done with 
> the 4 series?

No response to this? CentOS 4 just gets to be prettier than 5? Maybe 
I'll see if anyone bites on IRC.


More information about the CentOS-mirror mailing list