jep you are right. but theres nothging illeagl in spreading the seaces stuff (all gpl) correct my if am i amwrong On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Tosh <toshlinux at gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/08/09 20:03, Squadra Squadra wrote: > > aren´t the beta src.rpms open? i found the source dvd thing in rhn. do > > have to expect any problems from redhat if i publish them? i mean... its > > all gpled afaik > > > I don't think rh will put a contract on you, but it definitely isn't the > meaning to but what you get in rhn just online > > but the better question is, why would CentOS "waist" time in compiling > and testing a beta that will be a final release soon? (eta is end of > august if I remember well) > Seems to me as overkill, isn't their enough work already? > > > -- > Toshaan <toshlinux at gmail.com> - http://www.toshaan.be > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror > -- (\__/) (O.o ) (> < ) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "This bug is visible to non-employees. Please be respectful." (bugzilla) <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20090802/40f2a17d/attachment-0006.html>