Makes sense, but at the same time it doesn't. Centos including DVD is like what? 140GB max, with 5.3 and 5.4, like it is now. They should go look at fedora.... its like 900GB On 10/23/2009 1:26 PM, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Nick Olsen wrote: > > >> Never Thought of that.... >> I guess your right. >> Don't really see why ISO's shouldn't be carried though. >> > Disk space. > > Some people (I won't name names, *cough* warthog *cough*) might argue > that having ISO images is simply a replication of the packages we're > already carrying on the mirror and that there should be a better way > to handle stuff so that mirrors don't end up with multiple copies of > what is essentially the same data. > > -Jeff > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror > >