That's why we really need block level deduplication, ASAP... ;-) Jeff Sheltren wrote: > On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Nick Olsen wrote: > > >> Never Thought of that.... >> I guess your right. >> Don't really see why ISO's shouldn't be carried though. >> > > Disk space. > > Some people (I won't name names, *cough* warthog *cough*) might argue > that having ISO images is simply a replication of the packages we're > already carrying on the mirror and that there should be a better way > to handle stuff so that mirrors don't end up with multiple copies of > what is essentially the same data. > > -Jeff > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >