Need to give people that option though. I don't really think its worth the hassle, IMO On 10/29/2009 3:34 PM, Uwe Kiewel wrote: > Nick Olsen schrieb: > >> Addition of jigdo yes. Replace ISO's no. >> > Does it make sense? If someone whants to have a iso image, he will > download the iso file and will not use jigdo... > > More sense makes to keep the boot.iso and replace the DVD and CD images > by jigdo > > >> Educating joe sixpack on using something new, well I like to use >> altercation avoidance. >> >> On 10/29/2009 2:51 PM, Uwe Kiewel wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> what do you think about using jigdo for distributing iso Images? >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jigdo >>> http://atterer.net/jigdo/ >>> >>> advantages: >>> - save space at mirror because data are now redandant (as rpm's and >>> "inside" the iso images >>> - the webserver does handle small files more efficient than big >>> files >>> - can save bandwith if a download of an iso image aborts and >>> have to be restarted >>> >>> disadvantage: >>> - maybe more requests, for downloading all rpm's to build the iso >>> at client site >>> >>> >>> >>> Happy discussing! >>> Uwe >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS-mirror mailing list >>> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-mirror mailing list >> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror > >