Yes, I missed the "poll" entirely.... We already carry the DVD ISO's however so maybe we just didn't pay attention ;) Definitely IP based though makes much more sense to me.... Cheers, Paul -----Original Message----- From: centos-mirror-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-mirror-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jon Lewis Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:46 AM To: Mailing list for CentOS mirrors. Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] POLL: DVDs and access lists ... On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> a) Which mirror does *NOT* want to carry the DVD isos? > > Only one mirror does not want to but would - not bad, that was what I > wanted to hear ... A poll asking to hear only negative responses may be way off because some people just didn't read it, so not responding doesn't really mean anything. That said, I'd like the DVD isos for our mirror. > Password based ACLs on the other hand could break older, > non-maintained, but working setups - but they are easier to implement > and less error prone. Also easier to leak (hey, what's your mirror's centos rsync passwd? We want access too.) and abuse. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ _______________________________________________ CentOS-mirror mailing list CentOS-mirror at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror