On 04/08/2010 07:23 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Ralph Angenendt > <ralph.angenendt at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all you mirror people out there, >> >> today I'd like to present a small poll to you, a questionnaire if you like. >> >> a) Which mirror does *NOT* want to carry the DVD isos? >> > Only one mirror does not want to but would - not bad, that was what I > wanted to hear ... > > >> b) Who of you pull with machines where the IP address is different from >> the host from where you offer the mirror? Which IP address pulls for >> which mirror if your addresses differ? >> > Those weren't that many either. > > In your opinion, would you rather go with password based acls or with > ip based acls? > > If there's not that many mirrors which don't pull from the IP they are > serving from, the ip based acls can be calculated "on the fly" with > one more field in the database for machines which have a different > puller. > > Password based ACLs on the other hand could break older, > non-maintained, but working setups - but they are easier to implement > and less error prone. > > We would prefer IP-based ACLs. > Opinions? > > Ralph > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror > >