On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:44:14AM +0200, Kasparek Tomas wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 11:04:07PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > It would be great to know which server that is exactly (looks like
> > xinetd on CentOS 5 isn't as reliable as we'd like it to be).
>
> That's the problem. With round-robin DNS repsonses, I cannot say which
> server was used when the query failed.
>
> running
>
> SRV=`dig @pdns1.centos.org. msync-dvd.centos.org | grep ^msync | awk '{print $5}'`;
> echo $SRV;
> rsync $SRV::CentOS-incdvd/TIME
>
>
> several times, I found, that 213.175.193.160 is not available, but there
> may be more such machines.
iptables issue (for rsync) on 213.175.193.160 (centosr4.centos.org), fixed
Thanks for pointing it out.
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20100506/1a0c5162/attachment-0004.sig>