Maybe a idea, Why not choose the least busy ones, Say there are 100 mirrors, 5 are busy and 5 almost unused Isn't it a better idea to let the 5 busy and the 5 unbusy pull from centos.org And have the other 90 pull from the 5 unbusy? That should even the load better. I recommend my mirror (mirror.roelf.org), i'm the only one pulling data from it, i've got bandwith enough. And i sync to centos.org. -------------------- Roelf Software software.roelf.org www.roelf.org -------------------- Op 5 apr. 2011 om 11:39 heeft Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> het volgende geschreven: > On 04/05/2011 10:20 AM, Prof. P. Sriram wrote: >> Maybe it's been discussed before, but would it not be worthwhile to do a >> DNS based thing for this? We create a temporary rsync source domain > > Thats quite a lot of work, I'm more keen on having ACL's in place that > only allow some specific mirrors ( maybe the 100 busiest ones ) to pull > from centos.org; and have everyone else pull from them. > > - KB > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror