So? This would still lower the load from centos.org. Isn't it a good idea? -------------------- Roelf Software software.roelf.org www.roelf.org -------------------- Op 5 apr. 2011 om 22:52 heeft Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> het volgende geschreven: > On 04/05/2011 12:30 PM, Roelf Wichertjes wrote: >> >> Maybe a idea, >> Why not choose the least busy ones, >> Say there are 100 mirrors, 5 are busy and 5 almost unused >> Isn't it a better idea to let the 5 busy and the 5 unbusy pull from centos.org >> And have the other 90 pull from the 5 unbusy? >> That should even the load better. >>> On 04/05/2011 10:20 AM, Prof. P. Sriram wrote: >>>> Maybe it's been discussed before, but would it not be worthwhile to do a >>>> DNS based thing for this? We create a temporary rsync source domain >>> >>> Thats quite a lot of work, I'm more keen on having ACL's in place that >>> only allow some specific mirrors ( maybe the 100 busiest ones ) to pull >>> from centos.org; and have everyone else pull from them. > > > from 'busy' -i meant more like kernel.org / heanet.ie or mirrorservice.org > > - KB > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror