By the way, can someone add a function to the mirror-status so you can let it sort sites on other things then country? -------------------- Roelf Software software.roelf.org www.roelf.org -------------------- Op 7 apr. 2011 om 17:11 heeft Roelf Wichertjes <info at roelf.org> het volgende geschreven: > Also i found out that i made a error in the cron settings, instead of it syncing once every 12 houres, it synced every 12 DAYS, i fixed it, hopefully fixing the low ranking > > > -------------------- > Roelf Software > software.roelf.org > www.roelf.org > -------------------- > > Op 7 apr. 2011 om 17:03 heeft Roelf Wichertjes <info at roelf.org> het volgende geschreven: > >> Oh, by the way: >> What's "mirror age, daily stats" at the mirror list? >> I'm increasing the sync rate to once an hour. >> >> >> -------------------- >> Roelf Software >> software.roelf.org >> www.roelf.org >> -------------------- >> >> Op 7 apr. 2011 om 16:58 heeft Roelf Wichertjes <info at roelf.org> het volgende geschreven: >> >>> I've got the bandwith and speed for it, >>> I once pulled all 7 install iso's (at the same time) from a high ranked mirror, it took me 16 min. >>> Then did the same but now used my mirror, it took me 15 min. >>> My bandwith is enough. >>> Ps. I know what a busy server is. >>> I get a bonus from my host if i have a lot of traffic. >>> I forgot the tier of the site and i removed the --delete flag. >>> (my mail software is broken and the webmail i'm using can't handle the e-mail format of the list-admin, so i can't read the mail in which he told me the tier). >>> >>> I'm ready for it! >>> >>> >>> -------------------- >>> Roelf Software >>> software.roelf.org >>> www.roelf.org >>> -------------------- >>> >>> Op 6 apr. 2011 om 20:42 heeft "Paul Stewart" <pstewart at nexicomgroup.net> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>>> I'm curious as to what a busy mirror is... >>>> >>>> We are currently delivering about 60GB a day of CentOS files... does >>>> that put us at the bottom or near the top? ;) >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: centos-mirror-bounces at centos.org >>>> [mailto:centos-mirror-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of J.H. >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 1:37 PM >>>> To: Mailing list for CentOS mirrors. >>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] 5.6 is coming closer >>>> >>>> On 04/05/2011 01:52 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>>> On 04/05/2011 12:30 PM, Roelf Wichertjes wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe a idea, >>>>>> Why not choose the least busy ones, >>>>>> Say there are 100 mirrors, 5 are busy and 5 almost unused >>>>>> Isn't it a better idea to let the 5 busy and the 5 unbusy pull from >>>> centos.org >>>>>> And have the other 90 pull from the 5 unbusy? >>>>>> That should even the load better. >>>>>>> On 04/05/2011 10:20 AM, Prof. P. Sriram wrote: >>>>>>>> Maybe it's been discussed before, but would it not be worthwhile to >>>> do a >>>>>>>> DNS based thing for this? We create a temporary rsync source domain >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thats quite a lot of work, I'm more keen on having ACL's in place >>>> that >>>>>>> only allow some specific mirrors ( maybe the 100 busiest ones ) to >>>> pull >>>>>>> from centos.org; and have everyone else pull from them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> from 'busy' -i meant more like kernel.org / heanet.ie or >>>> mirrorservice.org >>>>> >>>>> - KB >>>> >>>> Tiering the mirror distribution is pretty common, and honestly makes >>>> things a *LOT* easier for everyone. I agree with the sentiments already >>>> stated, automation is what makes this all doable. Removing things like >>>> --delete from your mirrors, is just a PITA. Yes accidental upstream >>>> removals will happen, but if the mirror infrastructure is structured >>>> well it will propagate out and the fix will propagate out quickly. >>>> >>>> The way I've normally seen it is a small number (say 10) mirrors are >>>> allowed to pull form the master machines, and servers are then >>>> encouraged / forced to pull from those tier 1 mirrors. This means the >>>> tier 1's can pull more often from the upstream, and everyone else can >>>> make better use of the 1 & 10 gbps (and associated big hardware) links >>>> some of the bigger mirrors have. Personally I think it's worthwhile, >>>> and it's not too hard to implement. >>>> >>>> Keep in mind that the 'busier' servers (kernel.org at least) are in a >>>> better position (hardware / bandwidth) to support a greater number of >>>> people pulling from them. I would guess many of those "unused" mirrors >>>> may not be able to support the deluge you could potentially be pointing >>>> at them, this isn't universal but it's something to be aware of. >>>> >>>> - John 'Warthog9' Hawley >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CentOS-mirror mailing list >>>> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CentOS-mirror mailing list >>>> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS-mirror mailing list >>> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-mirror mailing list >> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror