I forgot to change that, 2 weeks ago i got a e-mail from my host saying: Our new data-center is finished! <some specs> We will be moving the servers! --------------- Sorry for that. -------------------- Roelf Software software.roelf.org www.roelf.org -------------------- Op 7 apr. 2011 om 17:16 heeft "Paul Stewart" <pstewart at nexicomgroup.net> het volgende geschreven: > Why are you listed under Canada when your server is in the USA? > > 1 dis1-rtr-tu-ge0-0.nexicom.net (76.75.85.129) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec > 2 dis2-rtr-mb-ge9-7.nexicom.net (76.75.85.33) 0 msec 4 msec 0 msec > 3 ge5-1-9-4.core1.toronto1.nexicom.net (98.124.0.226) 12 msec 8 msec > 12 msec > 4 gige-g2-20.core1.tor1.he.net (209.51.163.145) [AS 6939] 12 msec 12 > msec 12 msec > 5 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.nyc5.he.net (72.52.92.165) [AS 6939] 24 > msec 28 msec 24 msec > 6 bluehost.tienyc.telxgroup.net (206.126.115.34) [AS 25973] 92 msec 92 > msec 92 msec > 7 tg2-5.ar01.prov.bluehost.com (69.195.64.41) [AS 11798] 92 msec 92 > msec 92 msec > 8 mirror.roelf.org (69.195.90.115) [AS 11798] 92 msec 92 msec 92 msec > > > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-mirror-bounces at centos.org > [mailto:centos-mirror-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Roelf Wichertjes > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:14 AM > To: Mailing list for CentOS mirrors. > Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] 5.6 is coming closer > > By the way, can someone add a function to the mirror-status so you can > let it sort sites on other things then country? > > > -------------------- > Roelf Software > software.roelf.org > www.roelf.org > -------------------- > > Op 7 apr. 2011 om 17:11 heeft Roelf Wichertjes <info at roelf.org> het > volgende geschreven: > >> Also i found out that i made a error in the cron settings, instead of > it syncing once every 12 houres, it synced every 12 DAYS, i fixed it, > hopefully fixing the low ranking >> >> >> -------------------- >> Roelf Software >> software.roelf.org >> www.roelf.org >> -------------------- >> >> Op 7 apr. 2011 om 17:03 heeft Roelf Wichertjes <info at roelf.org> het > volgende geschreven: >> >>> Oh, by the way: >>> What's "mirror age, daily stats" at the mirror list? >>> I'm increasing the sync rate to once an hour. >>> >>> >>> -------------------- >>> Roelf Software >>> software.roelf.org >>> www.roelf.org >>> -------------------- >>> >>> Op 7 apr. 2011 om 16:58 heeft Roelf Wichertjes <info at roelf.org> het > volgende geschreven: >>> >>>> I've got the bandwith and speed for it, >>>> I once pulled all 7 install iso's (at the same time) from a high > ranked mirror, it took me 16 min. >>>> Then did the same but now used my mirror, it took me 15 min. >>>> My bandwith is enough. >>>> Ps. I know what a busy server is. >>>> I get a bonus from my host if i have a lot of traffic. >>>> I forgot the tier of the site and i removed the --delete flag. >>>> (my mail software is broken and the webmail i'm using can't handle > the e-mail format of the list-admin, so i can't read the mail in which > he told me the tier). >>>> >>>> I'm ready for it! >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------- >>>> Roelf Software >>>> software.roelf.org >>>> www.roelf.org >>>> -------------------- >>>> >>>> Op 6 apr. 2011 om 20:42 heeft "Paul Stewart" > <pstewart at nexicomgroup.net> het volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>>> I'm curious as to what a busy mirror is... >>>>> >>>>> We are currently delivering about 60GB a day of CentOS files... > does >>>>> that put us at the bottom or near the top? ;) >>>>> >>>>> Paul >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: centos-mirror-bounces at centos.org >>>>> [mailto:centos-mirror-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of J.H. >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 1:37 PM >>>>> To: Mailing list for CentOS mirrors. >>>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] 5.6 is coming closer >>>>> >>>>> On 04/05/2011 01:52 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>>>> On 04/05/2011 12:30 PM, Roelf Wichertjes wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe a idea, >>>>>>> Why not choose the least busy ones, >>>>>>> Say there are 100 mirrors, 5 are busy and 5 almost unused >>>>>>> Isn't it a better idea to let the 5 busy and the 5 unbusy pull > from >>>>> centos.org >>>>>>> And have the other 90 pull from the 5 unbusy? >>>>>>> That should even the load better. >>>>>>>> On 04/05/2011 10:20 AM, Prof. P. Sriram wrote: >>>>>>>>> Maybe it's been discussed before, but would it not be > worthwhile to >>>>> do a >>>>>>>>> DNS based thing for this? We create a temporary rsync source > domain >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thats quite a lot of work, I'm more keen on having ACL's in > place >>>>> that >>>>>>>> only allow some specific mirrors ( maybe the 100 busiest ones ) > to >>>>> pull >>>>>>>> from centos.org; and have everyone else pull from them. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> from 'busy' -i meant more like kernel.org / heanet.ie or >>>>> mirrorservice.org >>>>>> >>>>>> - KB >>>>> >>>>> Tiering the mirror distribution is pretty common, and honestly > makes >>>>> things a *LOT* easier for everyone. I agree with the sentiments > already >>>>> stated, automation is what makes this all doable. Removing things > like >>>>> --delete from your mirrors, is just a PITA. Yes accidental > upstream >>>>> removals will happen, but if the mirror infrastructure is > structured >>>>> well it will propagate out and the fix will propagate out quickly. >>>>> >>>>> The way I've normally seen it is a small number (say 10) mirrors > are >>>>> allowed to pull form the master machines, and servers are then >>>>> encouraged / forced to pull from those tier 1 mirrors. This means > the >>>>> tier 1's can pull more often from the upstream, and everyone else > can >>>>> make better use of the 1 & 10 gbps (and associated big hardware) > links >>>>> some of the bigger mirrors have. Personally I think it's > worthwhile, >>>>> and it's not too hard to implement. >>>>> >>>>> Keep in mind that the 'busier' servers (kernel.org at least) are in > a >>>>> better position (hardware / bandwidth) to support a greater number > of >>>>> people pulling from them. I would guess many of those "unused" > mirrors >>>>> may not be able to support the deluge you could potentially be > pointing >>>>> at them, this isn't universal but it's something to be aware of. >>>>> >>>>> - John 'Warthog9' Hawley >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> CentOS-mirror mailing list >>>>> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> CentOS-mirror mailing list >>>>> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CentOS-mirror mailing list >>>> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS-mirror mailing list >>> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-mirror mailing list >> CentOS-mirror at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror