On 8/10/2011 3:48 AM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 06:42:52AM -0500, Adrian Reber wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:43:55AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 02:54:44AM -0500, Ralph Angenendt wrote: >>>> Am 02.08.11 20:36, schrieb Ralph Angenendt: >>>> >>>>> If some guys here want to begin drafting, I am all for it. >>>> >>>> Which obviously also means that we need a way to get the current mirror >>>> database into a format which one of those solutions can use. But as it >>>> is a rather simple format, I don't see any real issues there. >>> >>> Adrian Reber has a start with ~15 mirrors, probably hand-populated. A >>> script to convert from your format into MM is a couple hours worth of >>> work I expect, nothing significant. >> >> Yes, it is hand-populated. Is there already a CentOS machine where MM >> can be installed? >> >> Matt, do you plan to update the epel-6 MM package to the 1.4 branch or >> would you recommend installing the current 1.3.x package? > > Last night I merged pingou's work to port to TG2 into MM mainline (on > top of what is currently 1.3.7). I'm hoping to find time this week to > go through the ~100 patches that are on the 1.4 branch, and port those > conceptual changes to mainline on TG2. Then the testing begins in > earnest - it's a good bit of code change. Then we talk about > packaging for EPEL etc. > > For expediency here, CentOS should start with MM 1.3.x as-is; tell me > what works well for you, what other features you uncover you need to > really consider MM, and we'll go from there. > > Thanks, > Matt > Although, MM 1.3.x can't do much more useful than CentOS' current mirror system. I personally would wait for 1.4 if deploying it twice is a burden. Warren