Yes, these stats were only for our HTTP traffic on mirror.ncsa.illinois.edu. Our stats included a ton of 206, 400, 404, & 503 errors that skewed our numbers. Here are our revised stats that ignore those error codes.
Month 5-CD 5-DVD 4-CD 4-DVD
Jun 2011 234 206 269 67
May 2011 646 477 590 156
Apr 2011 632 451 556 249
Mar 2011 472 436 689 834
Feb 2011 335 261 377 102
Or using Kevin's approach, here are our top ISOs for May & April:
CentOS-5 - May 2011:
5247 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-bin-DVD.iso
313 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-LiveCD.iso
240 /centos/5/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.6-x86_64-bin-DVD-1of2.iso
201 /centos/5.6/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.6-x86_64-bin-DVD-1of2.iso
123 /centos/5.6/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.6-x86_64-bin-2of8.iso
66 /centos/5.6/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.6-x86_64-bin-DVD-2of2.iso
63 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-netinstall.iso
58 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-bin-1of7.iso
45 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-bin-2of7.iso
35 /centos/5.5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD.iso
CentOS-4 - May 2011:
19928 /centos/4.8/isos/i386/CentOS-4.8-i386-binDVD.iso
87 /centos/4.8/isos/alpha/centos-4.3-alpha-disc4.iso
86 /centos/4.8/isos/alpha/centos-4.3-alpha-disc2.iso
86 /centos/4.8/isos/alpha/centos-4.3-alpha-disc1.iso
85 /centos/4.8/isos/alpha/centos-4.3-alpha-disc3.iso
75 /centos/4.8/isos/i386/CentOS-4.8-i386-bin4of4.iso
75 /centos/4.8/isos/i386/CentOS-4.8-i386-bin3of4.iso
74 /centos/4.8/isos/i386/CentOS-4.8-i386-bin1of4.iso
73 /centos/4.8/isos/i386/CentOS-4.8-i386-bin2of4.iso
63 /centos/4.8/isos/x86_64/CentOS-4.8-x86_64-binDVD.iso
CentOS-5 - April 2011:
458 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-bin-1of7.iso
247 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-LiveCD.iso
238 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-bin-DVD.iso
84 /centos/5.6/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.6-x86_64-bin-DVD-1of2.iso
79 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-netinstall.iso
39 /centos/5.6/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.6-x86_64-bin-DVD-2of2.iso
38 /centos/5.5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD.iso
34 /centos/5.5/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.5-x86_64-bin-DVD-1of2.iso
32 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-bin-2of7.iso
31 /centos/5.6/isos/i386/CentOS-5.6-i386-bin-3of7.iso
CentOS-4 - April 2011:
88448 /centos/4.8/isos/i386/CentOS-4.8-i386-binDVD.iso
83 /centos/4.8/isos/alpha/centos-4.3-alpha-disc4.iso
83 /centos/4.8/isos/alpha/centos-4.3-alpha-disc3.iso
83 /centos/4.8/isos/alpha/centos-4.3-alpha-disc2.iso
83 /centos/4.8/isos/alpha/centos-4.3-alpha-disc1.iso
77 /centos/4.8/isos/i386/CentOS-4.8-i386-bin1of4.iso
74 /centos/4.8/isos/i386/CentOS-4.8-i386-bin3of4.iso
74 /centos/4.8/isos/i386/CentOS-4.8-i386-bin2of4.iso
73 /centos/4.8/isos/i386/CentOS-4.8-i386-bin4of4.iso
54 /centos/4.8/isos/x86_64/CentOS-4.8-x86_64-binDVD.iso
-Bill
----- Original Message -----
> On 06/10/2011 11:24 AM, Bill Glick wrote:
> > Here are some stats from mirror.ncsa.illinois.edu for the past few
> > months. I don't have any useful stats before that, since our current
> > server came online in mid-February.
> >
> > Hits of CD& DVD ISOs:
> >
> > Month 5-CD 5-DVD 4-CD 4-DVD
> > Jun 2011 146 2888 220 58
> > May 2011 484 6409 612 10404
> > Apr 2011 1920 1060 556 234565
> > Mar 2011 4943 10086 690 384329
> > Feb 2011 454 409 397 188
> >
> >
> > My data seems to support your decision, especially since it would
> > take 4-8 hits to download all the CDs, vs. 1-2 hits to download the
> > DVD ISOs. I'm puzzled why the CentOS-4 DVDs appear to be so
> > disproportionately popular.
> >
>
> the numbers for 4-DVD seem exceptionally odd. Are those all for http
> delivered isos ?
>
> thanks for your effort on this.
>
> - KB
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-mirror mailing list
> CentOS-mirror at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror