I'll second the statement of using rsync, it is far far better. Also you may have some problems with owner/group file permissions which are used to deal with the bit-flip. I'm not sure how well rsync can handle that situation going from the *nix world to the windows world. I'll admit I'm not sure this has really been tried, and I think you are likely going to just run into odd and weird problems where your copy of the repo is just oddly different than everyone elses. That said I am curious to see how well this works out. - John 'Warthog9' Hawley On 06/20/2011 08:02 AM, Anthony Somerset wrote: > wget is resource intensive > > use rsync for windows - http://www.brentnorris.net/rsyncntdoc.html > > Anthony Somerset > > *Somerset Technical Solutions* > somersettechsolutions.co.uk <http://somersettechsolutions.co.uk> > M: 07595568755 > E: anthony at somersettechsolutions.co.uk > <mailto:anthony at somersettechsolutions.co.uk> > T: http://twitter.com/anthonysomerset - http://twitter.com/somerset_tech > L: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthonysomerset > > > On 20 Jun 2011, at 15:45, Christopher Hawker wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I am planning on setting up a mirror (with a batch script) on a server >> running Windows Server 2003 using WGET for Windows and Scheduled >> Tasks. Could anyone see any possible issues using this method? The >> files would be downloadable by http only (for the time being) and I >> will look at setting up FTP on my server. >> >> -- >> If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call on >> +61 450 556 200. >> >> Regards, >> Christopher Hawker >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-mirror mailing list >> CentOS-mirror at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-mirror at centos.org> >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror