On 22/10/2011, at 20:12, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch at dell.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:36:06AM -0500, Anssi Johansson wrote: >> Anssi Johansson kirjoitti: >>> Hi, this message is related to the enhancement request I filed at >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4652 where I proposed to have an >>> IPv6-enabled CentOS torrent tracker. >> >> I'm delighted to notice that nobody seems to have any objections >> regarding this idea. So, when can we expect to see the new IPv6-enabled >> torrent tracker? > > You mention in the previous note that you're using opentracker. What > has your experience been with opentracker and IPv6? It's been about a > year since I looked into this for Fedora's use, but opentracker was > too buggy (trivial to crash with a query URL) to be usable. Has it > improved enough to be considered stable? Have they fixed it so you > can have a single binary rather than two (one for IPv4 and one for > IPv6) ? I am using transmission daemon with Fedora in an IPv6 setup. Indeed, I did not know that transmission supported IPv6, until I see lots of v6 traffic after tunnel setup. I had to config absolutely nothing! It just woks... >