[CentOS-mirror] New Mirror

[TechNutopia]

On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 18:21 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 11:38 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 16:43 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > > On 23.05.2012 21:03, TechNutopia wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:09 -0400, TechNutopia wrote:
> > > 
> > > >> 100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo
> of
> > > >> traffic.  Is this is an unrealistic limitation?  If so, I'd
> understand
> > > >> it not being listed.
> > > > I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS
> doesn't
> > > > need this one?
> > > 
> > > Sorry, there was a Linux conference here which took up most of my
> time
> > > during the last week.
> > > 
> > > We'd rather use mirrors having no traffic caps (no idea if there are
> > > mirrors which are sending out more than 1 TB in a month, but that
> can -
> > > at least during release time) happen.
> > > 
> > > If you have that kind of bandwidth available: Why not join the
> torrent
> > > seed if you want to help out delivering CentOS to the "masses"?
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Ralph
> > Ok, will change to torrents.
> 
> Removed monthly bandwidth usage limit, http only, rsync from
> us-msync.centos.org::CentOS 4 times/day.  It's allocated at 100mbps, but
> it's allowed extended bursts of 400mbps.
> 
> I think it's good to go.
> 
Strange, it's not performing well--Don't add it to the list.  Sorry.