On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 11:38 -0400, TechNutopia wrote: > On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 16:43 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > On 23.05.2012 21:03, TechNutopia wrote: > > > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 19:09 -0400, TechNutopia wrote: > > > > >> 100mbps--the plan is to keep the bandwidth usage to about 1 TB/mo of > > >> traffic. Is this is an unrealistic limitation? If so, I'd understand > > >> it not being listed. > > > I take it then that the US has sufficient mirrors and CentOS doesn't > > > need this one? > > > > Sorry, there was a Linux conference here which took up most of my time > > during the last week. > > > > We'd rather use mirrors having no traffic caps (no idea if there are > > mirrors which are sending out more than 1 TB in a month, but that can - > > at least during release time) happen. > > > > If you have that kind of bandwidth available: Why not join the torrent > > seed if you want to help out delivering CentOS to the "masses"? > > > > Regards, > > > > Ralph > Ok, will change to torrents. Removed monthly bandwidth usage limit, http only, rsync from us-msync.centos.org::CentOS 4 times/day. It's allocated at 100mbps, but it's allowed extended bursts of 400mbps. I think it's good to go.