On 20.12.2012 23:22, Adam Cantwell wrote: > On 12/20/12 3:04 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> That's not much, especially in a country (well, a rather large one, the >> US) where we have tons of mirrors with 1Gbps and even more with 100 Mbps. > > Well, when you say bandwidth cap are you asking how much total circuit > capacity I have or how much I'm willing to allocate to the mirror? > Total capacity is >2Gbps, but 30Mbps is what I was wanting to cap the > mirror at. I operated a tier 1 mirror two years ago at a previous > employer and the transit never exceeded 10Mbps. That being the case I > figured a cap of 30Mbps was reasonable. If that's not the case, then I > withdraw my request. Yeah, I'm sorry, but I don't think we have mirrors "that slow" in the US anymore - at least not new ones. I don't want people to suddenly find themselves at that speed. But thanks for your offer anyway, it's much appreciated. No offense and have a great new year, Ralph