I have a similar question. On mirrors.tripadvisor.com we are pulling from rsync://mirror.symnds.com/CentOS-vault-full We are serving the content as: rsync://mirrors.tripadvisor.com/centos-vault http://mirrors.tripadvisor.com/centos-vault/ We’re happy to be listed as a public mirror for this content. Does it make sense for us to pull it from somewhere closer to the origin? james > On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev <ftpadmin at kernel.org> wrote: > > On 18 November 2014 at 07:24, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: >> Well, I don't know how kernel.org and/or leaseweb.net were mirroring >> vault content (reposync ? lftp script ?), but we don't even list >> thoses as a valid Vault servers. >> Have you read http://vault.centos.org/readme.txt ? it contains the >> info you're looking for (including some rsync targets from machines >> with high-speed connections) > > Hi, all: > > Sorry, I managed to miss this. I'm not sure how long ago this stopped > working, but in our (admittedly very old) configuration we have the > following source to pull for archive.kernel.org: > > rsync://vault.centos.org/centos-full-store/ > > Is this requiring IP whitelisting these days, or what needs to happen > to make it possible for us to pull the vault data "from the horse's > mouth?" :) > > -K > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20141201/6e58032b/attachment-0002.sig>