We see that quite often - especially lately. I believe there are several machines providing the rsync service (or several mirrors) - why not expand the coverage to other mirrors that offer rsync (and whom keep up to date)? We offer rsync as a mirror and don’t see a lot of activity - a few other mirrors it looks like. Paul On 2014-07-18, 12:57 PM, "Scott Neville" <centos-mirror at keystealth.org> wrote: >Looks like centost5 is hitting its limit: > > >Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 07:54:03 -0700 (PDT) > >msync.CentOS.org rsync service (centost5) >--------------------------------------- > >This service is intended for the sole use of the CentOS worldwide mirror >network to synchronize mirrors. > >Unless you are running or intending to run a listed public CentOS mirror >use a mirror listed at http://centos.org/download/mirrors > >If you intend to populate a mirror for public use please read the >notes at http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreatePublicMirrors > >If you do use this service then it is implied that you are providing a >mirror for public use and giving us authority to publicise such mirror. > >@ERROR: max connections (40) reached -- try again later >rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at >main.c(1503) [receiver=3.0.6] >_______________________________________________ >CentOS-mirror mailing list >CentOS-mirror at centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror