On 04/15/2015 01:32 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > OTOH, I (personally) think that vault is like giving a gun for people > to shoot themselves in the foot : using > deprecated/unpatched/unsecured/unmaintained packages on a distro is > not what I'd consider best practice. There are a *few* corner cases > where it can be handy, but those are already mirroring internally > those versions, for specific usage, and don't rely on vault.centos.org I would completely agree with you IF vault.centos.org would not (AFAIK) also be the official source for the CentOS Source-RPMS. Which doesn't actually make that much sense - could vault perhaps be split up into something like the real vault and srpms.centos.org? The last one would arguably be more useful than the vault, and not just giving people a gun to shoot themselves with. -- Michael Meier, FTP-Admin Friedrich-Alexander-Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg Regionales Rechenzentrum Erlangen Martensstrasse 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany Tel.: +49 9131 85-28973, Fax: +49 9131 302941 rrze-ftp-admins at fau.de blogs.fau.de/ftp/