-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14/10/15 19:36, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Wed, October 14, 2015 11:39 am, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 14/10/15 12:47, Jarek Polok wrote: >>> I understand this concern but since all official mirror owners >>> are on this mailing list perhaps it would be sufficient to >>> inform everybody about it few weeks/months in advance ? (and >>> update howto at >>> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreatePublicMirrors >>> accordingly..) >> >> right, I appreciate that - however, the goto release for aarch64 >> happened very quickly, we had literally 2 days to workout the >> entire process and so took the safest option that gives us the >> most expandability down the road. >> >>> >>> (also: isn't RH going to release 7.X for aarch64 in the future >>> ? .. in that case would CentOS 7 for aarch64 be in same place >>> as x86_64 or in altarch ?) >> >> if they do, when they do, then if we have a clear downstream >> build, that would end up in /centos/ space, till then ( and maybe >> beyond ) we would keep the altarch/ space going for this. > > And IMHO this is the wisest decision to keep anything that is not > from upstream in a separate tree. > > Valeri > Well, as KB said, there is a need to define clearly what AltArch is. For example, it makes sense to say that armv7hl is AltArch as there is no upstream for it. It's interesting for ppc64/pp64le that is actually being built by Community, but with a real upstream version. Anyway, such discussion would need to happen on the centos-devel list, and not the centos-mirror one. Cheers, - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlYerEsACgkQnVkHo1a+xU51gQCfVHuKVNehCRYMSDpdDE2x3NJy +bIAnjfrTT+A/a9MGOZNNPf5IG+/B9RS =cbQb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----