Very strange. Our campus does have an intrusion detection system, however, I don't believe it's filtering http traffic. I ran your time test. How do I interpret these numbers? 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 1441026541 On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Anssi Johansson <centos at miuku.net> wrote: > 1.9.2015, 4.39, Ryan Nix kirjoitti: > >> There shouldn't be any bandwidth restrictions. I wonder if there was >> some kind of misconfiguration in the mount point where the data are >> stored. I made some adjustments thenI tried downloading from home and >> was getting 3 MBs per second. >> > > Oh, I'm sure the bandwidth isn't the problem. My concern was the HTTP > requests per second rate, not bytes per second rate. > > The way to test this is to run something like this: > for i in {1..50}; do curl http://mirror.sesp.northwestern.edu/centos/TIME; > done > > Oddly this seems to work fine from one U.S. host I have access to, but > doing that from .fi, .fr or .uk hosts seems to fail every now and then. > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-mirror mailing list > CentOS-mirror at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20150901/6e4613a7/attachment-0006.html>