On 04/07/16 17:19, Les.net CentOS wrote: > > On 2016-07-04 9:12 AM, mirror at muug.ca wrote: >> Maybe I misinterpreted what the sponsor field is asking, our hosting >> and bandwidth is being provided by LES.net, but the mirror is being >> run by the Manitoba Unix User Group. centos.les.net is a different >> server than muug.ca however I believe that Les.net plans to retire it >> once our mirror is in the list (since both servers are in the same >> datacenter anyway). > Wyatt is correct. The MUUG new mirror is hosted by Les.net, and we have > been operating our own mirror as well. > > The new mirror is higher performance and better connected (10Gbps vs > 1Gbps) so retiring centos.les.net makes sense. > > Does the mirror admin have a suggestion of best course of action? > > Jonathan Stewart > Network Engineer > AS18451 - Les.net Well, I haven't looked at the ASN but it's true that it doesn't make sense to have two mirrors serving content from the same location/DC (in that case AS18451 LES.NET). So if that's ok for you, we can probably just remove centos.les.net from our DB/list and have only muug.ca. OTOH, let's then consider LES.Net as the sponsor and not 'Manitoba Unix User Group' (if that works for you both) ? -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20160705/dee92316/attachment-0006.sig>