Hello and thanks for your quick answer. Actually these were my findings from a couple of weeks ago, and I wanted to post this sooner, but I didn't realize I was sending my emails with an alias NOT subscribed to the list (thus not getting sent). So ok, everything's fine, as the version 5 is EOL it's logical that mirrors would scrap this version to make place. 10x! Vlad From: Anssi Johansson <avij at centosproject.org> To: centos-mirror at centos.org Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 10:32 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] YUM UPDATE 26.4.2017, 11.13, Vladimir Mihai Pacuraru kirjoitti: > Hello everyone, > > Given the version 5 EOL two weeks ago, I reckon people have scrapped > their mirrors. I'm based in France, and I've checked: > > http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=i386&repo=os which returned: Are you sure about this? $ curl 'http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=i386&repo=os' Invalid release This would be the expected response, not a list of mirrors. If you get a list of mirrors with the above curl command, please rerun it with -v to see which IP address it is connecting to. > From this list ONLY http://miroir.univ-paris13.fr/centos/5.11/os/i386/ is still working. Odd, I get a 404. > And of this list ONLY http://mirror.in2p3.fr/linux/CentOS/5.11/os/x86_64/ is still working. True. Looking at http://mirror.in2p3.fr/linux/CentOS/5.11/ I see a readme file stating that this version of CentOS is deprecated, so it is syncing. Most likely in2p3.fr does not use the --delete flag for rsync to delete the files that are no longer on the master server. They should add --delete to fix this problem. _______________________________________________ CentOS-mirror mailing list CentOS-mirror at centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20170426/e481e856/attachment-0006.html>