[CentOS-mirror] CentOS-mirror Digest, Vol 221, Issue 2

Thu Oct 26 13:43:35 UTC 2023
Awesome Projects <mirrors at awesomeprojects.ro>

   Hello,

we experienced the same thing from the same IP's about 6 months ago. 
This happened simultaneously with some IPv6 classes. Can't supply the 
IP's however, we blocked all the netblocks we could identify as 
belonging to China.

On 10/26/23 15:00, centos-mirror-request at centos.org wrote:
> Send CentOS-mirror mailing list submissions to
> 	centos-mirror at centos.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	centos-mirror-request at centos.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	centos-mirror-owner at centos.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CentOS-mirror digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: DDoS attack (Dominik Nowacki)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:14:55 +0000
> From: Dominik Nowacki <dominik at clouvider.co.uk>
> To: Mailing list for CentOS mirrors. <centos-mirror at centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] DDoS attack
> Message-ID: <1CE1A3D7-BD4F-4BED-85BB-8AF3707C2E29 at clouvider.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> And same here.
> One of our mirror servers was impacted.
>
> Kind Regards,
> D
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 25 Oct 2023, at 12:40, ariel sabiguero yawelak <asabigue at fder.edu.uy> wrote:
>>
>> ?We had to implement equivalent filtering rules during the weekend from network 223.67.0.0/16... and after your experience, we will start blocking 182.255.33.0/24 too.
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>> ariel
>>
>>> On 25/10/23 8:24, Alex Iribarren wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This morning we stopped a DDoS attack on our mirror coming from China. The traffic was somewhat similar to what we've discussed in the past[1], except this time they weren't range requests, they were downloading the full iso files. The worst offenders were 223.67.0.0/16 and 182.255.33.0/24, in case you want to check your mirrors for signs of abuse.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/2022-April/077440.html
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CentOS-mirror mailing list
>>> CentOS-mirror at centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-mirror mailing list
>> CentOS-mirror at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-mirror mailing list
> CentOS-mirror at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of CentOS-mirror Digest, Vol 221, Issue 2
> *********************************************