Hi Kevin, On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 05:08:33PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > How are you determining this? From IP address? Yes. > Those could be a large number of different machines behind a nat proxy > no? Possibly. > Recent versions of fedora do not even download the filelists unless a > user requests/looks up something that needs it. For normal install or > updates, it shouldn't be pulled. Can you tell what OS/versions this is > happening with? Great! No, I just see basic file download information. Blocking those who do it much too often shouldn't be a concern then. > In general clients should pull the repomd.xml file and check if it's > changed, if not, use their cached versions. That's not what I see for quite a lot of peers. > This should normally already be the case, so I wonder what is happening > here, could be a bug in some version/os or otherwise something > unexpected. That's my guess too. Bye Carsten -- Dr. Carsten Otto http://verify.rwth-aachen.de/otto/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20240403/dab25d3a/attachment.sig>