>> The teams are free to organise them self in the way they see most fit, >> cultural differences make it impossible to have a unified structure. > > That depends on what you mean with "in the way they see most fit". I think > there must be a set of rules conducting "wanted practice" when presenting > at a fair/show/whatever. Same goes for content on websites. > >> Every team should have an "official" contact for communication between >> teams, the public, press and the global CentOS team. > > Hmmmhmmmhmmmm again. That "press" thing doesn't go down to well with me. If > someone on a regional team is going to do press, he has to be really well > known to the core team. > > But yeah, I like the idea in general, if someone wants to push that. Can you > bring those three paragraphs up there into something which can go through > as a proposal? > > I like the idea, but I don't see the people doing that at the moment - if they > are there I am more than glad to be proven wrong. > I would think a structure as following can be used to solve some problems attributed here : One worldwide promo leader with a backup person | each CentOS region with a regional leader (again with a backup leader) => both regional leaders need to know the worldwide promo leader and backup and have some "close" contact | promo team members regions are based on language and country/county (based on the size of the country) as suggested already