On 08/15/2010 03:41 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote: > Didi, our Editor in Chief, has asked me (in private) about the future > of the Newsletter. My response was to suggest that it should be > discussed here, with those who do their best, for each issue, with the > paucity of submitted content. > > Comments / views / opinions are hereby solicited. Is it a case of better defining the content that could / would go into the newsletter, and then making contribution to the newsletter easier for people ? I guess what I'm trying to say is, why is there little contribution: - because we have not defined the framework well enough - because its hard for people to find out how to contribute - Could it be that the content in the existing newsletter isnt what most people are looking for ? - KB