Hi folks, We had a web+docs meetup the day after FOSDEM. There were 10 or so people in the room, and we talked about a variety of topics around our web sites and docs. It was just a planning/discussion session, not a working session. This is a recap of our conversations. = Wiki The wiki is running on outdated, unmaintained software on a version of CentOS that will go EOL next year. It's a constant pain for infra, and most of the content isn't being kept up to date. We will decommission it. A large part of the rest of what we talked about has to do with what to do with content that is currently on the wiki. Fabian has already opened a conversation about this on centos-devel. Davide has already done work on creating a static export of the wiki so we can keep content around as long as it's needed. I'll be going over all the wiki content to see what should move where, or what should just be deleted. = SIGs SIGs can already publish docs on sigs.centos.org with mkdocs. People seem happy with this. Having to maintain SIG info also in the wiki is not good. We would like to make sigs.centos.org list all SIGs with relevant information. I already have a data file with a bunch of info I use to keep track of SIGs, so we may be able to build from something like that. It would be nice to get some design help. SIGs are encourages to write additional SIG documentation using the mkdocs system we have now. But all SIGs would have their basic info listed on sigs.centos.org, regardless of whether they produce docs on that site. = Docs There has been work inside Red Hat to upstream much of the RHEL docs to CentOS. This work is ongoing, but it will require the community to do work around conditionalizing content to make it appropriate for CentOS. I've talked about this before, including in my talk at the Dojo last August. I agreed to write a document explaining how to do this, which I haven't done yet. There are also docs that wouldn't come from RHEL, like the contributors guide. These would likely have to be produced with a different build system. People seem happy with mkdocs for SIGs, so maybe that's the answer. We also want to enable more short-form quick docs. Can those use the same system? I hope so. Regardless, given multiple sets of docs, it would be good to have docs.centos.org be a definitive list of them, regardless of where or how they're published. = Events We use the wiki to list events, both things we host, and things we have a presence at. We also recently created connect.centos.org, as the main page for CentOS Connect. Davide proposed setting up events.centos.org with the same sort of listing we have in the wiki now. We would keep connect.centos.org, but each Connect's site would be archived to the events site, along with non-Connect events. As always, we could use design help. = Forums forums.centos.org is also running on a version of CentOS that will go EOL next year. Something has to happen. There's interest in moving to Discourse. Currently, we have a CentOS category on Fedora Discourse. Should we set up our own? Would mailing list conversation move there, or would it be just user forums? How active will it actually be? Lots of questions. Needs followup. -- Shaun