[CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
Kai Schaetzl
maillists at conactive.comWed Oct 17 18:31:57 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kris Buytaert wrote on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:40:49 +0200: > I've been using LVM volumes for ages. > > You only have a limited amount of partitions so partitions don't scale. > > > > I only use files if I`m building a virtual machine that I want to give > to someone who isn't capable of kickstarting a system. Yeah, I meant to include LVM volumes in the general partition meaning. I wanted to know if you use/prefer/recommend partitions/LVM over files. Obviously, files are so much easier to maintain. I now have a test VM running on an LVM volume and am now wondering if there are other methods to move it around for instance as what Xen provides (I read there's a system migration feature, but i didn't read that up yet). Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list