Akemi Yagi wrote: >> humm no, I stand corrected, kvm-35 is indeed the last released version so far. > That's not what you said. You stated: > "Daniel pushed kvm-36 into testing yesterday, you might want to take a look." > 36 != 35 > 36 > 35 > And we were indeed talking about kvm-36 because -35 seems to have some > problems leading to a host oops. Not sure what your email implies, but kvm-35 is the last version released into testing. ( ref: http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/SRPMS/ ) -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq