I think the problem here is that CentOS isn't designed for personal use, nor do many of us feel that a binary only application should be included when a perfectly fine open source version is available. Also, I personally feel that the full version is more crippled than the open source version. Maybe there should be a separate package for the full edition, though. I can't see any harm coming from that. Thanks, Brian McKenna On Feb 3, 2008 10:54 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > Is there any need for CentOS to build and distribute the OSE version of > VirtualBox? > > The differences between the versions are here: > > http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Editions > > The reason I ask is that the Full version is free for personal use and > the restrictions (especially no USB or RDP) make the OSE version fairly > crippled, so I am not sure there is enough benefit to design and keep > updated the OSE RPM packages. > > What does everyone think? > > Thanks, > Johnny Hughes > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20080204/7d6fc441/attachment-0004.html>