Grant McWilliams wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Daniel de Kok <me at danieldk.org > <mailto:me at danieldk.org>> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Justin Lim <jlim0930 at gmail.com > <mailto:jlim0930 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Any ideal when 3.2 xen will be avail for centos? > > When the upstream distribution provides it. I am not sure if it is on > their roadmap. Of course, you could also use Xen 3.2 from XenSource, > but that's not supported here. > > Take care, > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-virt at centos.org> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > > > I was at a recent Linux convention and it seemed very likely that Xen > is no longer Redhat's priority at all and would love to put KVM in > it's place. The Redhat rep was very adamant about KVMs superiority > over Xen and the amount of unnecessary work to integrate Xen into > their kernels. Some day when KVM will actually do what Xen does (and > do it reliably!) Xen may not be an easy option. > > Grant > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > So are you saying we should start looking at using KVM instead? I've never seen it, nor used it, so how much different is it from XEN? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff