[CentOS-virt] xenbr0 vs. virtbr0
Ross S. W. Walker
rwalker at medallion.com
Thu Mar 20 15:54:30 UTC 2008
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Just created the first completely new Xen VM with the Virtual Machine
> Manager after 5.0 became 5.1 and I notice these two differences:
> - there's now virbr0 instead of xenbr0. Which means I have now xenbr0 and
> vitbr0 interfaces running. As virbr0 just the new name for xenbr0? If so,
> can I just change that name in the older configuration files, so that all
> use the same interface name?
I was confused initially by this too, but it turns out that virbr0 is the
libvirt managed interface (dnsmasq and non-xen qemu) and libvirt managed
clients use it by default. It should be pre-set with subnet 192.168.122.0/24.
I believe it is set to NAT with peth0.
xenbr0 is the Xen managed bridge and it comes with no default IP and it's
characteristics are managed purely through the xend configuration.
> - there is a (I think) new option for networking. There's virtual network
> and there's shared device. What's the latter? I don't remember this being
> available earlier. It doesn't list any devices for me. Does this refer to
> virtual devices of type eth0:5 etc. on the host?
I believe the virtual network is the standard xen network interface config
and the shared network is the virbr0 thing, but don't quote me on that,
as you said documentation isn't plentiful here.
> help is no help for this, it's empty for this section.
This page left intentionally blank?
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.
More information about the CentOS-virt