[CentOS-virt] xenbr0 isn't created anymore
maillists at conactive.com
Sun Mar 30 20:56:17 UTC 2008
Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:12:20 -0400:
> I think you are mixing the versions up or made a typo,
yes, I meant to write "Xen < 3.2".
> My configs still have xenbr0 listed, but the scripts will take any
> xenbr* and convert it to eth* if it exists and is a bridge. I don't
> have any problem with DHCP. I also have iptables currently disabled.
Before going to the new Xen I tried to use this explanation for building a
bridge for xend, but it doesn't work for me at all :-(
Unfortunately, bridge interfaces are missing from the Red Hat Deployment
Guide, I'm still looking for a guide about what can be used in bridge ifcfg
files. What I see on the net looks completely different.
Oh, and you were absolutely right about the routing. I changed the default
gateway to fit the public subnet and added a static route for the private
subnet and now the additional src in ip route list is gone. Didn't change that
the DHCPOFFER doesn't get back to the VM, though :-(
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
More information about the CentOS-virt