Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:12:20 -0400: > I think you are mixing the versions up or made a typo, yes, I meant to write "Xen < 3.2". > My configs still have xenbr0 listed, but the scripts will take any > xenbr* and convert it to eth* if it exists and is a bridge. I don't > have any problem with DHCP. I also have iptables currently disabled. Before going to the new Xen I tried to use this explanation for building a bridge for xend, but it doesn't work for me at all :-( http://henning.schmiedehausen.org/wingnut-diaries/archives/86 Unfortunately, bridge interfaces are missing from the Red Hat Deployment Guide, I'm still looking for a guide about what can be used in bridge ifcfg files. What I see on the net looks completely different. Oh, and you were absolutely right about the routing. I changed the default gateway to fit the public subnet and added a static route for the private subnet and now the additional src in ip route list is gone. Didn't change that the DHCPOFFER doesn't get back to the VM, though :-( Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com