Brett Serkez wrote on Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:16:45 -0500: > I've been using the stock Xen (2.6.18) that comes with the latest > CentOS 5.2 in production without major issue. At one time I had to > restart xend occasionally to be able to properly reboot guest OSes > from virt-manager, but even that has stabilized. > > What specifically is better about 3.2 that you are recommended it over > 2.6.18? AFAIK, you cannot run 32bit guests on 64bit hosts and the HVM support also lacks in the stock CentOS version (which is a 3.0.3/3.1 mix). As I'm not using both I can only reflect what others say. The latest version in 5.2 may also have some patches that Xen 3.2 has and thus works better. You are also getting the xenstore and it's functionality and better networking scripts (the virtual network interface structure changed significantly) with it. There were a lot of improvements from 3.0.3/3.1 to 3.2. My experience to date with CentOS is it tends to run the > latest, proven stable version of each package, which would make me > hesitant to run downloaded packages. That specific package from xen.org runs really well, but you also have to add two or three patches. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com