ok i was wrong, we use userspace 71 and kmod 72. userspace 71 was the last one which boot mandrake-10. Michael Schenck wrote: > What is the advantage of using userspace version 72 when you're using > version kmod 71? > > I'm too new to this to understand the pro's to mismatched versions > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org > <mailto:lfarkas at lfarkas.org>> wrote: > > as you can read bellow we use on the host kernel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5. > qemu is not required for kvm, but we use qemu-img-0.9.1-10 > > Michael Schenck wrote: > > For clarification, your statement "we currently use userspace from 72 > > and kmod from 71" pertains to use with the current centos kernel > > (2.6.18-92), correct? Also, which version of qemu are you using? > > > > - Michael Schenck > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Farkas Levente > <lfarkas at lfarkas.org <mailto:lfarkas at lfarkas.org> > > <mailto:lfarkas at lfarkas.org <mailto:lfarkas at lfarkas.org>>> wrote: > > > > Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > Farkas Levente wrote: > > >> Karanbir Singh wrote: > > >>> Farkas Levente wrote: > > >>>> as i wrote earlier i've got many packages backported from > fedora: > > >>>> http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/SRPMS/ > > >>>> but none of them really working (there are many kvm bugs on > > >>>> rhel/centos-5 which is not fixed:-() > > >>> its a bit academic to have packages if they dont work! > > >> > > >> each of them working with _some_ guest but none of them > working with > > >> all.. > > >> > > > > > > thats interesting, is there a table with details somewhere ? > eg. What > > > ver works with what guest ? > > > > read my mails in kvm list:-) > > anyway in short or setup at the end. > > guest: > > - mandrake-10 can't boot since 72 > > - centos x86_64 can't boot on 78,79 > > - fedora-9 can't boot with kernel-2.6.27.x in 77,78,79 > > - pxe boot not working long ago (at least 69) > > we currently use userspace from 72 and kmod from 71 this was > the last > > usable combination. at a new release i always try to boot > these guests > > and looking for any new version which will boot all and i > immediately > > stop building new kmods and stay at that version. > > there was a promise for a new stable version for 2.6.28. > <http://2.6.28.> > > <http://2.6.28.> > > imho the bast for wait for that. > > > > - host: > > - Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz > > - Intel S3000AHV > > - 8GB RAM > > - CentOS-5.2 > > - kernel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 x86_64 64bit > > - guest-1: > > - CentOS-5.2 - 4 vcpu > > - kernel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 i386 32bit > > - guest-2: > > - CentOS-5.2 - 4 vcpu > > - kernel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 x86_64 64bit > > - guest-3: > > - Mandrake-9 - 1 vcpu > > - kernel-2.4.19.16mdk-1-1mdk 32bit > > - guest-4: > > - Mandrake-10 - 1 vcpu > > - kernel-2.6.14.2-p4-smp 32bit > > - guest-5: > > - Windows XP Professional 32bit - 2 vcpu > > - guest-7: > > - Fedora-9 - 4 vcpu > > - kernel-2.6.27.5-37.fc9.i686 > > > > -- > > Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-virt mailing list > > CentOS-virt at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-virt at centos.org> > <mailto:CentOS-virt at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-virt at centos.org>> > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-virt mailing list > > CentOS-virt at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-virt at centos.org> > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > > > -- > Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-virt at centos.org> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"