[CentOS-virt] bonding over bridge or bridge over bonding ?

[Mickaël Canévet]

Hi,

I'm trying to configure a network bridge over a bonding without any
success. Here is my configuration:

ifcfg-eth0:

DEVICE=eth0
HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E5
ONBOOT=yes
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes

ifcfg-eth1:

DEVICE=eth1
HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E7
ONBOOT=yes
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes

ifcfg-bond0:

DEVICE=bond0
ONBOOT=yes
BRIDGE=br0
USERCTL=no

ifcfg-bridge0:

DEVICE=br0
TYPE=Bridge
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=192.168.52.55
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.52.0
BROADCAST=192.168.52.255
ONBOOT=yes
DELAY=0

eth0 and eth1 don't goes up...

Am I doing something wrong ? Shouldn't I trying to do a bonding over 2 bridges ?

Do anybody already tried such a configuration with success ?


Thanks

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________
Mickaël Canévet.
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
Grenoble Outstation. FRANCE
_______________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20081024/626f4254/attachment.bin