[CentOS-virt] bonding over bridge or bridge over bonding ?

Fri Oct 24 13:25:52 UTC 2008
Roy Firestein <lists at rturf.net>

Did you also edit the modprobe.conf file?
Here is a good guide:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces

Good luck,
Roy Firestein


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mickaël Canévet" <canevet at embl.fr>
To: centos-virt at centos.org
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:47:36 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [CentOS-virt] bonding over bridge or bridge over bonding ?

Hi,

I'm trying to configure a network bridge over a bonding without any
success. Here is my configuration:

ifcfg-eth0:

DEVICE=eth0
HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E5
ONBOOT=yes
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes

ifcfg-eth1:

DEVICE=eth1
HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E7
ONBOOT=yes
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes

ifcfg-bond0:

DEVICE=bond0
ONBOOT=yes
BRIDGE=br0
USERCTL=no

ifcfg-bridge0:

DEVICE=br0
TYPE=Bridge
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=192.168.52.55
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.52.0
BROADCAST=192.168.52.255
ONBOOT=yes
DELAY=0

eth0 and eth1 don't goes up...

Am I doing something wrong ? Shouldn't I trying to do a bonding over 2 bridges ?

Do anybody already tried such a configuration with success ?


Thanks

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________
Mickaël Canévet.
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
Grenoble Outstation. FRANCE
_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt