Some factors swaying my boss towards Xen/XenSource: On the quotes we've been getting, XenSource would cost half of what VMWare ESX would cost (not the stripped down free download obviously). We are a cash-strapped organisation, so the difference is significant. We are also looking to move as much of our server infrastructure as possible to a standardised RHEL/CentOS platform, whether as hosts or as guests. VMware runs on RHEL/CentOS of course, but a supported-out-of-the-box-by-the-OS-vendor alternative (like Xen) always has appeal. My boss is also interested in Citrix for some other stuff they do (virtual clients/application delivery). For my part, looks like I'm going to learn Xen, then learn KVM. I am just starting with Xen ... my sandbox is a new Dell PowerEdge 840 with Xeon Quad Core, 4GB RAM and 4 x 750GB HDD on a hardware RAID 5, so far it is all running like a dream. Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> You are asserting the Xensource lacks what the CentOS supplied >> xen has? wow > > I should also state that Xen is the coolest thing I have played with in ages. > I don't want to suggest I am not fond of it in any way, I love it and use it. I > just don't think the commercial product is polished enough. I really feel some > trivial lustre could be massaged into it. If I was shelling out cash, and the choice > was vmware or xensource you cant compare. Vmware has been at it a long time > and thier product is just so polished and solid. > > YMMV, > jlc > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt >