[CentOS-virt] Machine freeze

Mathew S. McCarrell mccarrms at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 22:18:32 UTC 2009


Well, I'm actually not using a PAExen kernel but I don't believe that I need
to be since I'm running the 64-bit version of CentOS.  Am I mistaken in that
assumption?

Thanks,
Matt

--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10

mccarrms at gmail.com
mccarrms at clarkson.edu


On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic <office at plcomputers.net
> wrote:

> Just to make sure, you are using PAExen kernel on 12GB RAM Linux? 4GB is
>  max for regular kernel without PAE extensions.
> Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
> > Yeah, the Dom0 should have plenty of memory left since only 2-3 GB of
> > memory is being used out of 12 GB installed.  The out of memory messages
> > were from the domU that I xm consoled into prior to shutting down that
> > particular VM because it was out of memory.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > --
> > Mathew S. McCarrell
> > Clarkson University '10
> >
> > mccarrms at gmail.com <mailto:mccarrms at gmail.com>
> > mccarrms at clarkson.edu <mailto:mccarrms at clarkson.edu>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Maros Timko <timkom at gmail.com
> > <mailto:timkom at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Mathew,
> >
> >     I would say no. Our system has freezed completely, it did not
> >     reboot. Our issue was caused by concurrent access to scheduler
> >     method that created a deadlock.
> >     I can see some out of memory messages, do you still have enough
> >     memory for Dom0?
> >
> >     2009/4/29 Mathew S. McCarrell <mccarrms at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:mccarrms at gmail.com>>
> >
> >         Hey,
> >
> >         I'm wondering if it is possible that your problem is related to
> >         mine.  Earlier today I had to restart one of our domUs on one of
> >         our systems.  I used xm shutdown instead of xm destroy and then
> >         did xm list to determine if the domU had shutdown or not.  Upon
> >         issuing xm list a second time, the entire server crashed and
> >         rebooted.
> >
> >         I've checked the logs and have yet to find anything.  I've
> >         attached a transcript of the commands as I executed them on the
> >         server.  The system is running CentOS 5.3 x64 w/Xen (kernel
> >         2.6.18-128.1.6.el5xen).
> >
> >         Any thoughts?
> >
> >         Thanks,
> >         Matt
> >
> >         --
> >         Mathew S. McCarrell
> >         Clarkson University '10
> >
> >         mccarrms at gmail.com <mailto:mccarrms at gmail.com>
> >         mccarrms at clarkson.edu <mailto:mccarrms at clarkson.edu>
> >
> >
> >         2009/4/7 Maros Timko <timkom at gmail.com <mailto:timkom at gmail.com
> >>
> >
> >             Hi all,
> >
> >             thanks to all for valuable replies.
> >             It seems like we identified the issue. We assured that it is
> >             not HW related as it was already reproduced on different
> >             machines and platforms, with different BIOS versions.
> >             We are running a system performance/statistics collector
> >             that executes "xentop" command on Dom0 regularly. This is
> >             causing issues. If we execute:
> >             xentop -b -d 0.1 > /dev/null
> >             in multiple instances, it will freeze the system.
> >             It was reproduced on CentOS 5.3
> >             (kernel-xen-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5) system.
> >             There is created a bug for this issue:
> >             http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3454
> >
> >             With regards,
> >
> >             Tino
> >
> >
> >             2009/4/3 Maros TIMKO <timko at pobox.sk <mailto:timko at pobox.sk
> >>
> >
> >                 Hi all,
> >
> >                 we are running CentOS 5.2 Xen virtualization system with
> >                 the latest CentOS packages with couple of VMs on DELL
> >                 PowerEdge. "Sometimes" the whole machine freezes without
> >                 anything in log files, anything on the console.
> >                 "Sometimes" really means we cannot define why or when.
> >                 Sometimes the machine was idle with just one VM,
> >                 sometimes quite busy with couple of VMs.
> >
> >                  Has anybody had the same experience? If yes, any hints
> >                 on how to resolve it or how to trace the cause?
> >
> >
> >
> >                 Thanks.
> >
> >
> >                 _______________________________________________
> >                 CentOS-virt mailing list
> >                 CentOS-virt at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-virt at centos.org>
> >                 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
> >
> >
> >
> >             _______________________________________________
> >             CentOS-virt mailing list
> >             CentOS-virt at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-virt at centos.org>
> >             http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
> >
> >
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         CentOS-virt mailing list
> >         CentOS-virt at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-virt at centos.org>
> >         http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
> >
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     CentOS-virt mailing list
> >     CentOS-virt at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-virt at centos.org>
> >     http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS-virt mailing list
> > CentOS-virt at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20090429/0f1e014c/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list