I didn't read this thread untill here, but mr Levente Farkas, I just wanna thank you by your LFarkas Repo! Last year (at october untill december) I use it to do my experiments with KVM (to my Conclusion's Course Job) and it helps me a lot. :) 2009/4/24 Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> > Rainer Traut wrote: > > Am 24.04.2009 00:28, schrieb Farkas Levente: > >> as i wrote to you this kmod rpm (as all other centos kmods) use > >> weak-updates so the kernel version is not included in the version by > >> desing. it's working with _all_ centos 5.x kernel. > >> > >> anyway i'll provide these rpms until centos-5.4 released and lets see > >> what will be in 5.4 and then... > >> anyway my current suggestion to use kvm-84. > >> as i be able to put together a consistent build far in my end i'll try > >> to provide i386 rpms too, but as i only use 64bit hosts i only compile > it. > > > > Thx for doing this. My F10 guest now has an uptime of 7 days and I > > cannot see any problem neither in dmesg nor in other logfiles. > > > > Ah one thing I forgot, I had to change the emulation of network card to > > e1000 after installing F10 updates. But this may well have been a > > NetworkManager problem - I disabled NM afterwards. > > no it was my patch since original centos kvm modules use e1000 by > defualt i patch all version to use it. but i thinking about to go back > to kvm's default rtl8169 in the next stable version (probably 86). > > -- > Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > -- Lucas Timm, Goiânia/GO. http://timmerman.wordpress.com (62) 9157-0789 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20090424/d0f2bba6/attachment-0003.html>