[CentOS-virt] The best network to use.
Rich
rhdyes at gmail.comSat Jul 25 23:19:05 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] The best network to use.
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] The best network to use.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ok thanks. On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Christopher G. Stach II <cgs at ldsys.net>wrote: > ----- "Rich" <rhdyes at gmail.com> wrote: > > > When using a para-virtualized guest, which network type should be > > used? > > Are you asking whether NAT vs. bridged is better? If so, it doesn't > matter. The guest is virtualized, remember? It doesn't know or care about > what's underneath. What matters is your physical host's network. > > -- > Christopher G. Stach II > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20090725/eb4993d3/attachment-0002.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] The best network to use.
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] The best network to use.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list