I am using the bridge. On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Dennis J. <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > On 07/25/2009 10:24 PM, Christopher G. Stach II wrote: > > ----- "Rich"<rhdyes at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> When using a para-virtualized guest, which network type should be > >> used? > > > > Are you asking whether NAT vs. bridged is better? If so, it doesn't > matter. The guest is virtualized, remember? It doesn't know or care about > what's underneath. What matters is your physical host's network. > > > > That might be true for desktop virtualization but when virtualizing a > server you probably want to go for the bridge to have your system reachable > from the outside and make it a proper member of your network > infrastructure. > > Regards, > Dennis > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20090727/a978d00c/attachment-0003.html>