Ok thanks. On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Christopher G. Stach II <cgs at ldsys.net>wrote: > ----- "Rich" <rhdyes at gmail.com> wrote: > > > When using a para-virtualized guest, which network type should be > > used? > > Are you asking whether NAT vs. bridged is better? If so, it doesn't > matter. The guest is virtualized, remember? It doesn't know or care about > what's underneath. What matters is your physical host's network. > > -- > Christopher G. Stach II > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20090725/eb4993d3/attachment-0006.html>