[CentOS-virt] Bad Disk Performance of domU
Christopher G. Stach II
cgs at ldsys.netTue May 26 17:32:50 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] Bad Disk Performance of domU
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] No cpu throttling for Xeon E5405?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- "Francisco Pérez" <fperez.x at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks all of you. Just with the nonsparse option works all right. > > Then an LVM+nonsparse+phy will be the better setup? > > Regards. Yes, except sparseness is only relevant to file-backed vbds in normal use. (There could ostensibly be a similar lazy block allocation option for a target on something like a SAN/NAS and you would expect some performance degradation for some writes.) -- Christopher G. Stach II
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] Bad Disk Performance of domU
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] No cpu throttling for Xeon E5405?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list